It’s hard to believe, but it’s been a bit over two years since Tim Devane joined us as a Principal at NextView. Tim joined our investment team as the first non-founder, and also as the first NextView team member based in our New York office. It’s not easy to pave a path with no one before you, but Tim has done just that and done it admirably.
Thanks in large part to Tim, the NextView family today includes exceptional founders of companies like Dia & Co, Timber, The Outline, and Parsec. He’s been a champion and supporter of NextView’s portfolio broadly, a thoughtful voice in our investment team discussions, and a driving force in the continued growth of our presence in New York. We’ve enjoyed watching Tim come into his own as a VC investor at NextView.
So it’s bittersweet for us to share the news that Continue reading "Tim Devane’s Next Chapter"
Today Optimus Ride announced a $5.25M seed round of funding
to continue developing their unique approach to autonomous transportation. NextView is pleased to co-lead this round along with our friends at FirstMark Capital as well as participation by other investors, and I’m excited to join Optimus’s board.
For those who follow my writings on my AgileVC blog or on Medium, you’ll know that I’ve been thinking about the autonomous vehicle space for some time. I say “autonomous vehicles” rather than “driverless cars”… when my little daughter has a family of her own someday, the phrase “driverless car” will be an anachronism akin to “horseless carriage”.
Optimus isn’t yet describing their plans in detail publicly, so I won’t be letting their cat out of the bag. But I’m thrilled to be able to partner with an extraordinarily experienced and talented group of co-founders. The Optimus team has its roots at MIT Continue reading "The Road to Autonomous Vehicles & Our Investment in Optimus Ride"
This is the 2nd post in a series about self-driving vehicles and it explores how autonomous cars could become a reality. Self-Driving Vehicles: The Future Always Takes Longer to Arrive is the 1st post and covers the state of the vehicle autonomy (circa mid 2016) and how we’ve gotten here.
So what are the different paths towards commercially available self-driving cars? The way forward includes not only advanced vehicles themselves but also potentially shifts in road infrastructure, laws and regulations, and even business models for “mobility.”
In my first post earlier this summer, I highlighted the fact that we’re still a ways off from truly autonomous vehicles, despite many decades of technological advances to assist drivers. The “Auto-Pilot” capability in Tesla’s Model S is currently the most advanced semi-autonomous (NHTSA Level 2) system you can actually buy, but it still has many limitations and Continue reading "Autonomous Vehicles: Can You Get There From Here? (Part 2)"
“Sometimes, there’s a man, well, he’s the man for his time and place. He fits right in there. And that’s the Dude…” –
The Stranger, The Big Lebowski
Today we announced our investment in The Outline, a new digital media company founded by CEO Josh Topolsky. The company plans to launch publicly later this year, but Josh talks about his vision for The Outline in this WSJ article
We like to back authentic founders here at NextView… entrepreneurs who have experience and unique perspective on the market they’re trying to transform. My colleague Tim Devane was the first one on our team to build a relationship with Josh, and Josh certainly fits this mold. The internet is about 20 years old but most digital media companies simply replicate the model of legacy print media businesses only without the printing press. Josh penned a widely read manifesto
earlier this year that laid Continue reading "Our Investment in The Outline"
Preface: As a consumer, I am excited by the prospect of autonomous vehicles and the individual and collective benefits they can provide. As an investor, I am also bullish about the innovation wave already in its early innings around mobility and autonomy. But a realistic understanding of the potential timeline for autonomous vehicle adoption is vital to decision making as a startup entrepreneur or investor in this area.
Rome wasn’t built in a day. In fact it wasn’t even built in a year or a decade, but rather a couple centuries. Autonomous vehicles will become widespread a lot faster than that, but it always takes longer than you think for the future to arrive. Fully autonomous vehicles (aka “Level 4” autonomy in NHTSA guidelines, where a car can navigate itself from A to B without any human involvement) won’t be generally available for “awhile”. IMO “awhile” is a minimum of 5 years from today,
Continue reading "Self-Driving Vehicles: The Future Always Takes Longer to Arrive (Part 1)"
Conventional wisdom is that when self-driving autonomous passenger cars arrive, they’re likely to decrease individual ownership of cars. If there’s a liquid supply of cars that can operate autonomously, one needn’t own a car… you could simply summon one on-demand from a fleet run by [Uber, Google, Apple, Ford, etc] and pay per use or subscription or whatever economic model emerges. Nobody wants a car, they want “mobility” says this line of thinking.
Let’s envision a future where cars are truly 100% self-driving and can operate autonomously (what’s known as Level 4 in NHTSA’s proposed framework
). Let’s assume that they are propelled by electricity or hydrogen or super-efficient gasoline hybrids or some other modality which eliminates or drastically mitigates the externalities associated with fossil fuel combustion. Let’s further assume that there are legal and financial frameworks that support this technological reality, e.g. insurance and liability law permits companies to manufacture and Continue reading "What If Self-Driving Cars Actually Increase Car Ownership?"
We’re off to a fresh start here at the beginning of 2016. Looking back at 2015, the standout theme in the VC/startup ecosystem was unicorn hunting. We started the year enraptured by the “Age of Unicorns” with this cover of Fortune in January 2015:
Illustration: Jeremy Enecio
But by the time we ended 2015, the headlines like “The Dangers Ahead if Tech Unicorns Get Gored (WSJ)” and “Regulators Look Into Mutual Funds Procedures for Valuing Startups (WSJ)“. “Unicorn” went from being a brass ring to reach for to a term used with sarcasm or derision. People started thinking of startup unicorns like this:
Illustration for WSJ: Chris Silas Neal
What happened? Was this simply a shift in sentiment among the tech & business media? A realignment of valuations by late stage investors? The beginning of a tech downturn? We can’t paint all “unicorns” with the same Continue reading "Seduced By Growth, But Terminal Scale Still Matters"